SIGTSTP propagation for 0.80 ?

[David Golden]

On 2005-09-22 16:34:34 +0100, David Golden wrote:
> 
> (If torque did have the ability to fiddle with signal propagation,
> maybe mpiexec _could_ actually query torque for the signal propagation 
> settings, probably once at start time, and warn if something was
> obviously amiss, though it would bring extra complexity to mpiexec).

minor oops - presumably with Garrick Staples' TM interface proposal, it
would also be possible for mpiexec to request the particular signal 
propagation behaviour it wanted from torque, and have the request 
granted/denied...