[PATCH] --pipe option
Pete Wyckoff
pw at osc.edu
Mon May 23 10:47:37 EDT 2005
Dries.Kimpe at wis.kuleuven.ac.be wrote on Thu, 05 May 2005 18:34 +0200:
> I've created a small patch for mpiexec (against 0.79, also applies to
> the current CVS head). It adds a --pipe option, which allows running an
> arbitray command to transform the hostlist. The --transform-hostnames
> option is kept, but changed internally to call the --pipe option with
> SED_PATH -e <sed script>.
>
> We (CPA, University of Leuven, Belgium) needed this patch because (after
> different extensions) our cluster now has a complex interconnect
> structure; We needed the pipe option to scan through the hostlist, in
> order to decide which interconnect/switch to use. (We use a perl script
> which scans the list, and checks if all are connected to one of the
> faster switches)
This is certainly a reasonable thing to want to do. I have a few
comments and questions, though.
1. Kludge warning: you could configure an unmodified mpiexec using
--with-sed=/usr/bin/cpa-script and change that program to accept
and ignore "-e junk", but I would agree that is somewhat ugly.
2. I still suspect this is a rare need, so instead of --pipe, how about
--transform-hostnames-program=<program>? This option would conflict
with the existing --transform-hostnames so nobody would try to
specify both.
3. Why do you need to start with a shell? For the convenience of being
able to rely on a path lookup for <program> rather than having to
specify the entire path at runtime? Why the configure option to
specify the shell; can we just assume that they have /bin/sh since
they are running the configure script itself?
Let me know what you think and I'll work on integrating this sometime.
-- Pete
More information about the mpiexec
mailing list